TheBizzare.com

Cool, Funny, and Bizarre

Archive for the ‘Crime’ Category

The Mothman

Posted by rappin On June - 14 - 2008

Mothman was the name given to a strange creature thought to have been sighted many times in the Point Pleasant area of West Virginia, on the border with Ohio between November 1966 and November 1967. Some observers described the creature as a man-sized beast with wings and large reflective red eyes, while others claimed that the creature possessed luminous eyes. A number of hypotheses have been put forward to explain what people reported, ranging from paranormal phenomena to owls, but no definitive explanation has ever been reached.

 

 

 The-Mothman

The Mothman was first sighted November 12, 1966 by a group of five men who were preparing a grave in a cemetery close to Clendenin, West Virginia when what they described as a “brown human shape with wings” lifted off from behind nearby trees and flew over their heads.

Late at night on November 15, two young married couples from Point Pleasant, Roger and Linda Scarberry and Steve and Mary Mallette, were out for a drive in the Scarberrys’ car. They were passing a World War II TNT factory about seven miles outside of Point Pleasant, in the 2,500 acre  McClintic Wildlife Station, when they noticed two red lights in the shadow by an old generator plant near the gate of the factory. They stopped the car and were startled to see that the lights were the glowing red eyes of a large animal, “shaped like a man, but bigger, maybe six and a half or seven feet tall, with big wings folded against its back,” according to Roger Scarberry. Terrified, the couples drove off in their car, heading for Route 62. Going down the exit road, they saw the creature again, standing on a ridge near the road. It spread its wings and took off, following their car to the city limits. They went to the Mason County courthouse and told their story to Deputy Millard Halstead, who later said “I’ve known these kids all their lives. They’d never been in any trouble and they were really scared that night. I took them seriously.” He followed Roger Scarberry’s car back to the TNT factory, but found no sign of the strange creature.

The next night, November 16, local townspeople, armed, went searching the area around the old TNT plant for signs of Mothman. Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Wamsley and Mrs. Marcella Bennett with her baby daughter Teena were in a car on their way to visit their friends, Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Thomas, who lived in a bungalow among the “igloos” (concrete dome-shaped structures erected for explosives storage during WWII) close to the TNT plant. The igloos were now empty, some owned by the county, some by companies intending to use them for storage. They were headed back to their car when a figure appeared behind their parked car. Mrs. Bennett said it seemed like it had been lying down, slowly rising up from the ground, large and gray, with glowing red eyes. While Wamsley phoned the police, the creature walked onto the porch and peered in through the window at them.

On November 24, four people saw it flying through the air over the TNT area. On the morning of November 25, Thomas Ury, who was driving along Route 62 north of the TNT, who said he saw the creature standing in a field by the road, then spread its wings and take off, following his car as he sped into Point Pleasant to report it to the sheriff.

On November 26, Mrs. Ruth Foster of the Charleston, West Virginia suburb of St. Albans saw Mothman standing on her front lawn, but it was gone when her brother-in-law went out to look. On the morning of November 27, it pursued a young woman near Mason, West Virginia, and was reported again in St. Albans the same night, by two children.

The Mothman was seen again January 11, 1967, and several times during 1967.

By this time, most of the sightings had come to an end and Mothman had faded away into the strange “twilight zone” from which he had come… but the story of Point Pleasant had not yet ended. At around 5:00 in the evening on December 15, 1967, the 700-foot bridge linking Point Pleasant to Ohio suddenly collapsed while filled with rush hour traffic. Dozens of vehicles plunged into the dark waters of the Ohio River and 46 people were killed. Two of those were never found and the other 44 are buried together in the town cemetery of Gallipolis, Ohio.

On that same tragic night, the James Lilley family (who still lived near the TNT plant at that time) counted more than 12 eerie lights that flashed above their home and vanished into the forest.

The collapse of the Silver Bridge made headlines all over the country and Mary Hyre went days without sleep as reporters and television crews from everywhere descended on the town. The local citizens were stunned with horror and disbelief and the tragedy is still being felt today.

So who was Mothman and what was behind the strange events in Point Pleasant?  Some believe the sightings where the result of mass hysteria, overactive imaginations, and large birds.  Others see the Mothman as a harbinger… the omen of a horrible tragedy.  Supposedly, Mothman has been seen in other parts of the world before a disaster.

One things for sure.  If you’re ever out somewhere and see a large brown man with wings and glowing red eyes… perhaps you should move!

When Awkward Happens

Posted by rappin On June - 6 - 2008

click on image to enlarge

google-street-view

 

Women trapped in trunk on Google Street View! Doesn’t look like she fits.

A couple of guesses on who this unfortunate person might be:

- Britney Spears hiding form paparazzi

- Rosie “Rosie” O’donnell

- Sam Cassell

Leave your guesses in the comments.

Grand Theft Auto in Reallity

Posted by rappin On May - 29 - 2008

Grand-Theft-Auto-Reallity

 

Grand Theft Auto Police Chase in Reallity

Pictures that Changed the World

Posted by rappin On May - 23 - 2008

 

Berlin-wall

BERLIN—A young man bridges the wall between East and West Berlin, 1989. © Raymond Depardon

 

Slate magazine has a collection of Magnum photos which changed the world. Mostly doused in black and white gradients, these pictures feature significant historical incidents. Some of them, like the picture of the girl who grew up in a concentration camp are remarkably powerful reflections on our actions.

 

-Spain—Federico-Borrell-Garcia

CERRO MURIANO, Spain—Federico Borrell Garcia, Spanish loyalist militiaman, collapses into death, 1936.

 

This is a classic photo and I like it because the Spanish soldier looks totally peaceful and dare I say it, graceful even when falling to his death. Some have said it was faked but I don’t care. It’s beautiful.

 

POLAND—Teresa

POLAND—Teresa, a child in a residence for disturbed children, grew up in a concentration camp. She has drawn a picture of “home” on the blackboard, 1948. © David Seymour

 

This picture is just mind blowing. The kid is out of whack and severely traumatized by growing up in a concentration camp. Chalk lines that go nowhere and stay nowhere.

 

Racism

NORTH CAROLINA—A black man drinks at segregated water fountains, 1950. © Elliott Erwitt

 

White’s man burden. The difference is stark and very direct. It just hits you right in the face. White Americans even believed that they deserved better drinking fountains. Absurd.

 

Africa—Police

 SHARPEVILLE, South Africa—Police open fire on a crowd, killing more than 70 and injuring hundreds of others during what came to be known as the Sharpeville massacre, 1960. © Ian Berry

 

I love the shot of the clouds in the picture. Ominous. Apocalyptic. Bearing weight upon everyone beneath it.

 

Martin-Luther-King

WASHINGTON, D.C.—At the climax of his “I Have A Dream” speech, Martin Luther King Jr. raises his arm on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and calls out for deliverance with the electrifying words of an old Negro spiritual hymn, “Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”, 1963. © Bob Adelman

 

Walking in the shadow of the valley of death, King does his thing and the audio for this speech is electrifying.

 

anti-Vietnam-War

ARLINGTON, Va.—Jan Rose Kasmir confronts the National Guard outside the Pentagon during the 1967 anti-Vietnam War march, 1967. © Marc Riboud

 

This is a very iconic picture for many reasons as it totally symbolized the hippy creed of love overcoming all adversity and conflict.

 

The key to the appeal of Riboud’s seminal image may be Kasmir’s empathy for her adversary. “All of a sudden, I realized ‘them’ was that soldier in front of me—a human being I could just as easily have been going out on a date with,” Kasmir says. “It wasn’t a war machine, it was just a bunch of guys with orders. Right then, it went from being a fun, hip trip to a painful reality.”

 

Vietnam-dead-girl

SAIGON, Vietnam—The Saigon fire department, which has the job of collecting the dead from city streets, has just placed a girl, killed by U.S. helicopter fire, in the back of their truck, where her brother finds her, 1968. © Philip Jones Griffiths

 

Grief has been a main subject for many photographers and the little boy’s despair is heartbreaking.

PARIS—Students

 

PARIS—Students hurl projectiles during the May 1968 student protest. © Bruno Barbey

 

The student protest in Paris was no Tiananmen but was a remarkably fun period for many students because of the massive energy on the streets. Protests, films, arts, secret meetings, marches, songs.. .the id unleashed in full glory. Barbey’s picture makes them look like they were dancing.

 

MEXICO—Mexicans-border

MEXICO—Mexicans are arrested while trying to cross the U.S. border, 1979. © Alex Webb

 

I love the color in this one. The maroon and browns of the shirts with the yellow daffodils. The helicopter becomes a misplaced contraption within the natural environment.

 

Afghan-girl

PESHAWAR, Pakistan—An Afghan girl at Nasir Bagh refugee camp, 1984. © Steve McCurry

 

No worthy collection of seminal photography would ignore this iconic picture by McCurry. National Geographic made it big and this is really just a beautiful picture. Her eyes are incredible.

 

NEW-BRIGHTON

NEW BRIGHTON, United Kingdom—1985. © Martin Parr

 

I would love to know the context of this slightly surrealistic picture. Is he sunbathing or protesting with his body? The placement of the body just in front of the demolishing tractor just makes it so ambiguous. Love the little kid in pink.

 

Veiled-women

TEHRAN, Iran—Veiled women learn how to shoot in the outskirts of the city, 1986. © Jean Gaumy

 

Powerful picture. Women in Iran are generally treated like crap and heavily controlled by many fundamentalist rules. This picture is empowering and shows the strength of Iranian women.

 

BEIJING-China

 

BEIJING, China— © Stuart Franklin

 

I can see why this picture was such a big hit when it was published. One person can make a change. Just one is usually enough to derail a movement or at least force it to reflect upon itself.

 

Tank Man, or the Unknown Rebel, is the nickname of an anonymous man who became internationally famous when he was videotaped and photographed during the Tiananmen Square protests on 5 June 1989. Several photographs were taken of the man, who stood in front of a column of Chinese Type 59 tanks, preventing their advance.

Rare colour photograph of Hitler’s birthday

Posted by rappin On May - 16 - 2008

Hitler’s-birthday

 

As an arch propagandist, Adolf Hitler was happy to see his life recorded in dark shades of grey.

The Nazi leader believed that traditional black and white photographs best highlighted the sinister nature of his regime, presenting dramatic images which were both powerful and menacing.

Now, however, an altogether more colourful view of the Fuhrer has emerged.

More than 62 years after his death in a Berlin bunker, images from a newly opened Paris archive show him relaxing with children in the Eagle’s Nest, his mountain top chalet in the Alps near Berchtesgaden, Bavaria.

Hitler is celebrating his 50th birthday party on April 20th 1939.

While the dictator does not look in the best of physical health and appears to stoop slightly, the shiny-faced Ayran boys and girls are immaculately dressed in bright pastel colours.

All were likely to have been the sons and daughters of Nazi party dignitaries.

Hitler never had any children of his own, but liked spending time with other people’s - forever enthusing about how important they were to the biological future of the 1000 year Reich.

His chief propaganda minister Josef Goebbels’ six children were one of his surrogate families, as were the sons and daughters of his architect Albert Speer.

Other pictures show Hitler out of uniform, reclining in a pin-striped grey suit and looking over the Bavarian valleys while wearing a Homburg hat.
advertisement

With him in the latter colour portrait is Eva Braun, his loyal girlfriend who was with him throughout the war years right up until the pair took cyanide capsules as Russian forces approached. Also featured in the colour photographs is Hitler’s beloved German Shepherd Dog, Blondie, who also remained with his master until the final hour.

The more official looking photographs in the archive show an early rally of the SA - or “Storm department”- the brown shirted mobsters who assisted Hitler’s rise to power in the 1930s. Its leader Ernst Rohm - once a close ally of Hitler - was later murdered by the SS.

All of the pictures have been released by the Rue des Archives picture agency which was founded in the French capital in 1936 - four years before Nazi forces occupied Paris.

Hitler was one of the most photographed people in the world during the 30s and 40s, and took a close personal interest in all the images produced by his personal photographer, Heinrich Hoffmann.

However, Hoffman was not used to using colour, meaning that the Paris batch of photographs is likely to be the work of Hugo Jaeger, who specialised in what was a relatively new technique at the time.

The Machinery of Freedom

Posted by rappin On April - 23 - 2008

The-Machinery-of-Freedom

 

Pyramid of Capitalist System

Max Cornelisse - Train Station Hack

Posted by rappin On April - 18 - 2008

Max Cornelisse from Holland is a 24 year old science grad who pokes fun at how insecure some systems are.
Max Cornelisse takes control of a huge display at a train station in Utrecht from his cell phone

TOP 10 Mugshot Shirts

Posted by rappin On April - 16 - 2008

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-1

 No, but you are awesome.

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-2

Better hope you’re in jail for less than that.

 

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-3

Never mention Sex in the pen

 

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-4

 He must have been busy…your whole life.

 

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-5

Arrested Drunks go to jail.

 

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-6

Better hope you aren’t sharing a cell with one.

 

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-7

 Say that to the judge.

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-8

Except in this case.

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-9

Bambi: Kmart by day, Stripper by night

 

Funny-Mugshots-shirts-10

 About bunnies? No.

5 Famous Inventors (Who Stole Their Big Idea)

Posted by rappin On April - 5 - 2008

It has become clear that it’s up to the Cracked staff to re-educate America. See, we slept through high school, so we were lucky. We avoided the years and years of brainwashing that accompanies a standard education.

To those of you unfortunate enough to have been subjected to a lifetime in the public school system, we’ve got some bad news for you that you probably won’t find in your text books: Every brilliant inventor you’ve ever loved is a huge, thieving asshole.


#5. Galileo Galilee

Galileo Galilee or “Gal-Gal,” as he is more commonly known, was an Italian astronomer, physicist and mathematician. If you asked the average high schooler what Galileo’s lasting contribution to science was, they would most likely reply “the telescope” before going off to listen to their Rhianna records and play with their Digimon, (Is that what high schoolers do these days? We don’t even know anymore). Well, put down that Digital Monster, high schooler, because we are about to blow your mind: Gal-Gal did not invent the telescope. Also, Rhianna sucks.

Who Actually Invented It?

While everyone was probably looking up at the stars, no one was doing it quite as hard as Dutchman Hans Lippershey. In 1608, Lippershey completed the first ever telescope and attempted to receive a patent for it, but was denied for no discernible reason.

Lippershey’s telescope (internet re-creation)

A few countries over, when Galileo heard about Lippershey’s work, he quickly built his own telescope in 1609. A telescope, it should be noted, that could see just a little bit further than Lippershey’s.

Necessary? Not particularly. Emasculating? Oh, you betcha. While Galileo never registered a patent for his telescope, the fact remains that his name is synonymous with the telescope, while Lippershey was most likely absent from your old textbooks.

In a final shot to show just how fairly each scientist was rewarded, four moons surrounding Jupiter are named after Galileo, and do you know what carries Lippershey’s name? A crater. A fucking crater on Earth’s moon will forever be known as Lippershey’s Crater. The Moon’s Ass Crack.

#4. Alexander Fleming

Sir Alexander Fleming is the name people think of when penicillin is brought up. There’s even a charming little story that goes along with it. According to the legend, Fleming’s father saved a little boy from drowning in Scotland, and the father of this boy vowed to fund the young Fleming’s education to repay the kindness. Eventually, Fleming graduates med school and discovers the healing nature of penicillin which eventually saves Winston Churchill’s life when he is stricken with pneumonia. And who was the little boy that Fleming’s father saved in the first place? Winston motherfucking Churchill.

This would all be very cozy, if it wasn’t for the fact that it’s total horseshit on several counts. For one, Churchill wasn’t treated with penicillin and, for another, Fleming wasn’t the guy who discovered it. He was just some asshole.

Who Actually Discovered It?

Difficult to say. North African tribesmen have been using penicillin for thousands of years. Also, in 1897, Ernest Duchesne used the mold penicillum glaucoma to cure typhoid in guinea pigs which, OK, was about the stupidest waste of time in the history of science, but proof that he understood the possibilities of penicillin all the same.

Other scientists at the time didn’t take him serious, due to his age and strange preoccupation with guinea pigs, so he never received a patent for his work. He died about 10 years later from a disease that would have been completely treatable with penicillin and he was survived by his healthy, yet totally indifferent guinea pigs.

Even when Fleming did accidentally discover penicillin years later, he didn’t think it could actually be used to help anyone, so he stopped working on it and moved on. Meanwhile, a few other scientists, Howard Florey, Norman Heatley, Andrew Moyer and Ernst Chain started

working on penicillin and eventually mastered penicillin as well as figured out a way to mass produce it.

So even though Fleming wasn’t the first person to discover penicillin, and even though he didn’t actually believe penicillin was in any way useful, he will forever go down in history as a penicillin-inventing, Winston-Churchill-saving genius.


#3. Alexander Graham Bell

Ah, Bell. The man behind the telephone and a good guy all around. Bell spent a whole lot of time working with deaf people. His wife was deaf, his mother was deaf and he was even Helen Keller’s favorite teacher. With this time-consuming near-obsession with deaf people, it’s amazing that Bell found time to invent the telephone. Wait, not “amazing.” “Impossible.” That’s the one.

Who Actually Invented It?

In 1860, an Italian named Antonio Meucci first demonstrated his working telephone, (though he called it the “teletrofono,” mostly because Italians are wacky). Eleven years later, (still five years before Bell’s phone came out), he filed a temporary patent on his invention. In 1874, Meucci failed to send in the $10 necessary to renew his patent, because he was sick and poor and Italian.

Two years after that, Bell registered his telephone patent. Meucci attempted to sue, of course, by retrieving the original sketches and plans he sent to a lab at Western Union, but these records, quite amazingly, disappeared. Where was Bell working at this time? Why, the very same Western Union lab where Meucci swore he sent his original sketches. Eventually, Meucci died penniless and faded away into obscurity.

 

Did Bell, given his convenient position at Western Union, destroy Meucci’s records and claim the telephone as his own invention? It’s difficult to say. One source says “Yes, definitely,” while others just say “probably.” It makes sense, if you look at the facts: Bell already had a number of important inventions under his belt; it isn’t unreasonable to assume he just got greedy and didn’t want to see anyone else succeed. Further, why would Bell even need a phone? Both his wife and mother were deaf. Who the hell was he gonna call?

#2. Albert Einstein

According to all of your science books and that one episode of Animaniacs, Albert Einstein, Time Magazine’s Man of the Century, invented the theory of relativity. Certainly, when you hear the name Einstein, you undoubtedly will think “He discovered relativity” or “He came up with that E=mc2 equation” or “He was a total sex maniac.” Only one of those things is true. (It’s the sex maniac part.)

Who Actually Invented It?

Henri Poincaré, mostly. Poincaré was the foremost expert on relativity in the late 19th century and was most likely the first person to formally present the theory of relativity. If you were Einstein and you wanted to write about relativity, you might consider meeting with the foremost expert on relativity, yes? If you answered “yes” to that question, then you’re not Einstein at all.

According to Einstein’s famous On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, which contains his theories on relativity, Poincaré, despite publishing 30 books and over 500 papers, is not worth mentioning. It’s true, pick up Einstein’s paper if you don’t believe us, (you won’t): Poincaré doesn’t receive a single reference, unless you consider plagiarism to be some kind of indirect reference. As a matter of fact, Einstein does not reference, footnote or cite a single goddamn source in his entire paper.

Really? Not one source? Even we cite sources, Albert, and we’re friggin’ Cracked. What the hell?

Einstein, photographed with God

We don’t want to jump to any conclusions here. Maybe Einstein’s paper didn’t contain any sources because he genuinely didn’t read any other current physics texts or papers. Maybe he was seriously that smart. According to Peter Galison’s Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps: Empires of Time, Einstein and a small group of his fellow nerdlings formed a group called The Olympia Academy and would regularly gather to discuss their own works as well as the works of current scientists. The book goes on to specifically mention how Poincaré was one of the scientists that Einstein and his battalion of nerds would discuss.

Shoots that whole “maybe Einstein didn’t read any other papers” theory right to shit, doesn’t it? It’s interesting that Einstein sat studying and discussing the work of Poincaré for years, published a book that featured a theory that was startlingly similar to Poincaré’s, and then didn’t reference Poincaré once in the entire book. Wait, that isn’t interesting? It’s plagiarism. It’s total bullshit plagiarism. Good luck sexing your way out of this one, Einstein.
Einstein in 1951 (age 72)
#1. Thomas Edison

Thomas Edison. The “Wizard of Menlo Park.” Described as one of the “world’s most prolific inventors” with a record-breaking 1,093 patents to his name. You know, a guy could round up and kidnap a buttload of children and keep them forever, but would you call that guy the “world’s most prolific father?” No, of course not. A “soulless monster,” maybe. A “skilled thief,” if you’re being generous. Perhaps even the “King of Pop.” But you wouldn’t call that guy “the world’s most prolific father,” because those aren’t his kids. He stole them. Such is the case with Thomas Edison.

Sure, Cracked’s staunchly anti-Thomas Edison stance is already fairly well documented, but we’re afraid one article detailing what a prick this prick was just isn’t enough. Edison is still celebrated in schools across the country for inventing the light bulb, the motion picture, electricity and a shit-ton of other important crap he had very little to do with.

Edison’s only original invention, the “Face Vacuum.”

Since there literally isn’t enough space on the internet to cover all of the inventions that Edison didn’t invent, we’re just going to focus on the light bulb today.

Who Actually Invented It?

Everyone else. We all know how Edison exploited and took advantage of the poor, but brilliant Nikola Tesla, but who else did Edison step on? Sit back.

Plenty of people messed around with the idea of the light bulb, (Jean Foucault, Humphrey Davy, J.W. Starr, some other guys you’ll never read about in a history text book), but Heinrich Goebel was likely the first person to have actually invented it, back in 1854. He tried selling it to Edison, who saw no practical use in Goebel’s invention and refused. Shortly thereafter, Goebel died and, shortly after that, Edison bought Goebel’s patent, (you know, the one he saw no merit in), off of Goebel’s impoverished widow at a cost much lower than what it was worth.
One of nine light bulbs Edison accidentally got wedged in his anus during its development

Screwing over just one inventor might be alright for Galileo, but Edison was a dreamer and he couldn’t be satisfied with just one, dead disgraced inventor under his belt. So, after Goebel, and a year before Edison “invented” his light bulb, Joseph Wilson Swan developed and patented a working light bulb. When it was clear Edison’s “Fuck Swan” defense wouldn’t hold up in court, he made Swan a partner, forming the Ediswan United Company and effectively buying Swan and his patent.

Soon enough, Edison acquired even more power and bought out Swan completely leaving all records of the light bulb under the care of the Edison Company. Sure, Swan had money, but in buying all of the records, Edison could take sole credit for the light bulb. So, he’s got a laundry list of inventors he’s either stepped on, bullied, exploited or bought out to his name, but what do they say about Edison in the textbooks? Father of the fucking light bulb.

Nuremberg Trials

Posted by rappin On April - 4 - 2008

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

When asked to name the “trial of the century,” the post-literate, B-list-celebrity-obsessed, TV-anchor-as-Oracular-voice Generation X-Minus-One will almost invariably come up with the acquittal of O.J. Simpson as the scholarly height of bootylicious jurisprudence.

But for sheer carnage (not to mention actual historical relevance), nothing beats Nuremberg.

After World War II, the Allies found themselves uncomfortably confronted with an awful truth they had tried studiously to ignore even as the war was in full heat. This was the Holocaust.

You would think, especially when hearing modern leaders discuss war, that the U.S. entered World War II in a fever of moral outrage to thwart the evil of Adolf Hitler and his program of genocide. But that wasn’t the case. There had been scattered reports in the media about mass murders of Jews, but they received little play. People were more upset about Pearl Harbor. The American public, always the last to know, didn’t hear about the concentration camps until 1942, and it took the international community until 1945 to actually win the war and then figure out what to do about the War Crimes.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

What they ended up doing, of course, was the Nuremberg tribunal, an indictment of 24 of the most egregious offenders they had managed to catch, and six organizations that supported the Holocaust in various ways.

There were three major charges levied during the Nurermberg tribunals: Crimes against peace (i.e., waging a “war of aggression”), war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The first charge was problematic in a number of ways, although the easiest to prove. For one thing, it was predicated on international agreements that were worded in persnickety ways. For another, well, it’s not like the Nazis were the first people ever to wage a war of aggression.

The latter two charges had legs, however.

The charge of “war crimes” related to atrocities performed by the Nazis in relation to the prosecution of the war itself. This included “murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.”

Crimes against humanity were defined in the Nuremberg charter as “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.”

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

A broad range of individuals and institutions were subject to prosecution under these guidelines, although the number of actual people tried, convicted and sentenced was relatively small (compare to the estimated 6 million Jews and millions more Allied soldiers killed during the course of the Nazi regime).

The individual defendants included Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess and Albert Speer, Hitler’s war minister, along with most of the governors of occupied territories and several propaganda and economic support personnel. The President of the Reichsbank was indicted, as well as Julius Streicher, one of Hitler’s chief propagandists; Baldur von Schirach, head of the Hitler Youth; and Karl Doenitz, who led the Third Reich during the approximately five-minute interval between Hitler’s death and the end of the Third Reich.

During his trial, Goering, who had been chief of the German Air Force and a key player behind the Holocaust, casually dismissed the concentration camps as “protective custody,” denied that the S.S. had ever been ordered to kill anyone (that was the Gestapo’s job, he explained), and quibbled with prosecutors over whether he had called for a “total” or “final” solution to the “Jewish problem.”

Despite the leverage he could have extracted from a death-bunker statement in Hitler’s will accusing him of disloyalty and attempting to secretly negotiate an end to the war, Goering also proclaimed his enduring loyalty to der Fuhrer. He was eventually sentenced to hang, but he committed suicide before the sentence was carried out.

His peers fared little better. The president of the Reischsbank was sentenced to life in prison, and most of the military governors were sentenced to life or death by hanging. Hess received life in prison, where he committed suicide. Martin Bormann was convicted in absentia, but was later determined to be already dead.

SS General Otto Olendorf wasn’t considered “important” enough to be prosecuted during the first round of war crimes tribunals, despite the fact that he testified to personally ordering the execution of more than 90,000 Jews. Under questioning from prosecutor Col. John Amen, Olendorf’s testimony summed up the worst qualities of many of the defendants, an incredibly detached attitude toward the Reich’s program of genocide, consistently showing more regret for the workplace stress endured by the executioners than for the victims of said executions:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

COL. AMEN: What were (the S.S. officers’) instructions with respect to the Jews and the Communist functionaries? OHLENDORF: The instructions were that in the Russian operational areas of the Einsatzgruppen the Jews, as well as the Soviet political commissars, were to be liquidated.

COL. AMEN: And when you say “liquidated” do you mean “killed?”

OHLENDORF: Yes, I mean “killed.” (…) Some of the unit leaders did not carry out the liquidation in the military manner, but killed the victims singly by shooting them in the back of the neck.

COL. AMEN: And you objected to that procedure?

OHLENDORF: I was against that procedure, yes.

COL. AMEN: For what reason?

OHLENDORF: Because both for the victims and for those who carried out the executions, it was, psychologically, an immense burden to bear. (…) Until the spring of 1942, yes. Then an order came from Himmler that in the future women and children were to be killed only in gas vans.

COL. AMEN: How had the women and children been killed previously?

OHLENDORF: In the same way as the men, by shooting.

COL. AMEN: What, if anything, was done about burying the victims after they had been executed?

OHLENDORF: The Kommandos filled the graves to efface the signs of the execution, and then labor units of the population leveled them. (…) I received the report that the Einsatzkommandos did not willingly use the vans.

COL. AMEN: Why not?

OHLENDORF: Because the burial of the victims was a great ordeal for the members of the Einsatzkommandos.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

In his closing remarks, U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson summed up the responsibilities of Hitler’s minions in a historic speech. “I admit that Hitler was the chief villain. But for the defendants to put all blame on him is neither manly nor true. We know that even the head of the state has the same limits to his senses and to the hours of his days as do lesser men. He must rely on others to be his eyes and ears as to most that goes on in a great empire. Other legs must run his errands; other hands must execute his plans. On whom did Hitler rely for such things more than upon these men in the dock?”

In the end, suicide, escapes and the casualties of war allowed the worst offenders of the Nazi regime to escape the direct hand of Justice, and somehow death by hanging doesn’t quite seem to measure up to lampshades made of human skin.

But Nuremberg did result in some convictions. And the tribunals united the international community against the horrors of genocide and unchecked fascism (at least momentarily).

And that’s a lot more important than O.J., as trials of the century go…

Timeline

18 Oct 1945 Indictments brought against Nazi leadership.
20 Nov 1945 Trials commence in Nuremberg.
c. 1945 “Jackson [the chief prosecutor] is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” U.S. Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, noting that not only was this a case of the victor dictating terms, but also expected rules of jurisprudence such as prohibition of ex post facto were not being followed, Quoted in Alpheus T. Mason’s 1956 book, Pillar of the Law.
25 NOv 1945 Defendant Robert Ley suicides.
1 Oct 1946 Martin Boorman sentenced to death at Nuremberg, in absentia.
16 Oct 1946 Herman Groerning commits suicide with a cyanide capsule.
16 Oct 1946 Nazis hanged, among them Joachim von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel, Alfred Rosenberg, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl.